Richmond High Rape-What do we do with this? PDF Print E-mail
Written by Byron Williams   
Wednesday, 28 October 2009
Image Rape is a unique crime.

Unlike other offenses, it is difficult to see any mitigating circumstances that would result in someone taking another person’s humanity.  There is nothing in our legal system that falls into the murky category of  “justifiable rape”.

I’m certain someone will valiantly, or should I say ignorantly, send me an e-mail explaining how they were in a situation where mitigating circumstances did apply.

But rape can never be about mitigating circumstances; it is about someone exerting their power over someone else.  The power/powerless dynamic is never a good one, especially when one finds themselves on the powerless end of that continuum.  

Simply stated, rape is one of the most vile acts in our society.  There is a Cro-Magnon characteristic that is beneath our post-modern culture.But the events last Saturday night at Richmond High School is a painful reminder that rape is not something exclusive to the days when Cro-Magnon walked the earth some 30,000 years ago.

Richmond police believe as many as 20 people watched and reportedly cheered as a 15-year-old girl was robbed, beaten and gang-raped outside her high school homecoming dance.

What’s most tragic and leaves the community and the nation in disbelief is that none of the onlookers felt compelled to do anything to stop the barbarism.  The onlookers used their cell phones to take photos of the spectacle rather than call police.  When did rape become a spectator sport?

The imagery conjures memories of the gruesome photos of whites gleefully posing in front of black lynched bodies.  It is the sense of elation rooted in profound hatred that is beyond the skill sets of most to comprehend.
The repeated assaults lasted more than two hours, until news of the rape reached someone’s home several blocks from school, and they made the call to police.

What do we do this? It was not until someone at the scene had their fill of this uncivilized display, and decided to share the news with others before it appeared to be something that warranted police involvement.

One local news broadcast suggested the crime was beyond the realm of the victim’s faith community to provide an answer—it should be.  The faith community cannot, nor any other, offer a definitive answer that unlocks the mystery of such tragedy.  All faith can do is assist the community to navigate through this obvious absurdity of the human condition.

As of this writing, the victim remained hospitalized with non-life-threatening injuries. Five individuals have been arrested and charged on suspicion of sexual assault and robbery—two adults and three juveniles.

Given the attack occurred on school grounds, questions remain whether Richmond High bears some responsibility.  For its part, the school disgracefully released a statement suggesting it is the parent’s responsibility to ensure their children return home safely.

This pathetic attempt at damage control indicates Richmond High may be more concerned about its own vulnerability, rendering themselves insensitive to its poor utilization of timing.

Moreover, it is doubtful there will be the type of protests demanding justice, like those for Oscar Grant III, who was shot in the early morning hours of New Years Day by a BART police officer.

There is no need to replicate the worst examples by some protesters, who used the Oscar Grant death as a justification for mayhem, but doesn’t this case warrant similar demands for justice?

It’s unfortunate, but our justice/injustice sensibilities seem to work best when the color lines are delineated by black and white.  We are not nearly as impassioned when that line is blurred by gender, sexual orientation or when the assailant and victim are of the same race.

If we are not careful, we can find ourselves siding with perpetrators by suggesting had the victim not drank to excess, as it has been reported, none of this would have happened. That may be true on the surface, but when does drinking too much justify taking someone’s humanity?

This case is reflective of a societal breakdown that is not limited to the Richmond city limits.  No community is immune regardless of what its demographics indicate.  Those arrested live in various communities, and only one thus far attended Richmond High.  

But I did hear something that I must take issue.  Someone referred to the perpetrators as animals.  They are not animals. I’m confident the uncivilized act committed at Richmond High is beneath any behavior exhibited by my dog Zeus.





Reddit!Del.icio.us!Facebook!Slashdot!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Furl!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
Comments (11)add comment
Nic: ...
Louis,

Rape is not sex. Rape is rape. So, if you take away all of the other harms done to this girl, you would not be left with "sex." You would be left with "rape," a form of torture, not sex.

Regarding the analogy of choosing between your father's ring and being raped, I think if you had ever been raped, you wouldn't have to think too hard about what choice you would make.

1

report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 22, 2009
Votes: +0
Louis: ...
Victoria,

Thank you for your response. I know you strongly disagree with me and I appreciate your keeping the conversation civil despite that disagreement.

For two hours these boys had power. Part of the reason they abused it so horribly is that it was an unfamiliar situation. They had no experience with the healthy, constructive use of power. They didn't know how to handle it. They were drunk with power---in addition to being literally drunk, most likely.

Now they are powerless again. No one is more powerless, more helpless, than a person with all of society turned against him. But while their crime was committed on a wild night, in the heat of the moment, what our society will do to them will be done in the cold light of day, with deliberately blind eyes turned away from their suffering. That is why they have my sympathy.

You say I'm shutting down the conversation. All I'm doing is interpreting these events in a different way. I don't deny the girl's suffering, or the boys' guilt, but I see no reason to dwell on these things because other people are already doing that. I want to say what isn't being said.

I could explain in more detail why I think the boys did what they did. To me it seems fairly easy to understand. I suspect most people don't want to hear it because they don't want to understand.

It's grimly amusing that we see pretty much the same sort of group mentality taking hold in the community as happened on that night in Richmond. In both cases there is a designated victim. Then it was the girl, now it is the boys. The group turns on the victim. The victim is now the "other". It is inappropriate in such a group to show empathy for the victim. We're supposed to believe they deserve whatever happens to them, and that their suffering does not matter.

You may object to my use of the word "victim" here, saying that the boys deserve what's coming to them. All I'm trying to do is show the parallel between the situations.

On homecoming night someone did eventually call 911, and the rape was stopped. There's no one I can call to stop what's happening now.
2

report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 03, 2009
Votes: -2
Victoria: ...
Louis,

After reading your past couple of exchanges with Cara, I really think you need to step back and look at how what you're saying is coming across if you want anyone to listen to you. You are most definitely coming across as minimizing the crime of rape, and I'm sorry, but that really shows that you can't imagine a 2 hour gang rape, started by someone that you knew and/or trusted.

I don't necessarily think that our current system does any kind of job of rehabilitation, and I've worked with enough teens (and read enough on the brain in adolescence) to question the collective decision to try them as adults, but you still make a couple of points that are just preposterous:

1) You call the boys "truly powerless." No. They actually had quite a bit of power last Saturday night and they chose to abuse it by deliberately hurting (over and over) another human being, who at that point had far less power than they did. In that moment, they made a choice and yes, they may end up paying for that choice for the rest of their lives. While I am not sure what we really should DO as a society in this situation, they made specific and deliberate choices-- they were not powerless and they were not the victim. They were the perpetrators. Period.

2) It is not easy to understand (at least for me, and I'm guessing for a host of other people, based on public and private conversations) why these kids did this. It is not easy for me to understand how you deliberately hurt another person, or how you stand there and watch it, or how you take pictures with your (or the victim's) phone and send them to people. It is not easy for me to understand why someone would come out to watch this like it was a spectator sport. If it's easy for you to understand this, then perhaps you either need to pay attention to why other people are so horrified or figure out a better way to express yourself, because your statements are only making you seem more and more impossible to really hear and take seriously.

I don't want these boys to be raped-- in prison or anywhere else--because I know what it is and I wouldn't want that to happen to anyone. However, they made some horrifically bad choices and I'm not overwhelmed with sympathy for them. They had two and a half hours to reconsider their choices-- this wasn't a split-second decision.

I understand that you are trying to get people to see this a different way-- but you're doing more to shut down the conversation right now than keep it going.
3

report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 02, 2009
Votes: +3
Louis: ...
Cara,

It was not my intent to minimize it. This girl went through a horrible experience that may have left her scarred for life. I don't deny that.

What I did want to do was call for a little compassion, mercy, and a sense of proportion for the others involved. Every story, every opinion I read about this case seems to reflect a growing lynch mob mentality. People are out for blood on this one. These kids are facing life sentences and that's what they may very well receive.

You see, I can pretty much imagine a two hour gang rape. I may not fully comprehend the horror of it or the lasting psychological consequences, but I think I can grasp the essentials.

What I can't even imagine, though, is the effect of a life sentence given to a 15-year-old boy. It's simply too big. I think of the span of time, the amount of experience, that separates me from my own 15-year-old self. Then I picture that entire span spent living in an overcrowded cage, with violence a daily fact of life. I just can't get my mind around it. I can't imagine what that kind of life does to a person, or what kind of twisted caricature of a human being is left at the end.

And the really sickening thing is, it hasn't happened yet. There's nothing we can do now to help the girl that isn't already being done. The violent portion of her ordeal is over. But we could, as a society, simply decide not to inflict a far greater horror on those boys. It doesn't have to happen. But it will, because our society is sick enough to think that kind of torment is a good thing. We're so addicted to revenge we have to keep upping the dosage to maintain our high.

In Sunday's paper I read another opinion piece, this one by Tammerlin Drummond. She writes with apparent approval about the likelihood of these boys being raped in prison. I've seen that same opinion in other places as well. In his column Pastor Byron wrote that there is no such thing as justifiable rape. Well, Drummond and the rest of the lynch mob seem to think he's wrong about that.
4

report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 02, 2009
Votes: -2
Cara: ...
Well, Louis, in spite of my better judgment, I will reply one more time. You've done quite a job of minimizing the harms suffered by all victims of rape and, in particular, the gang rape of a 15 year old child who has endured one of the most terrifying, painful and degrading experiences possible. I'm sure she'll be thrilled to know that the crime of gang rape has been so improved what with morning after pills and all.
5

report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 02, 2009
Votes: +2
Louis: ...
Cara,

Thank you for sending a thoughtful, reasoned reply. When I sat down to read the blog this morning I frankly expected to find a bunch of people screaming at me for what I said yesterday. Maybe the pastor runs a higher class of blog than that.

I do not mean any insult to what you or the girl in Richmond have experienced, and I apologize in advance if what I have to say below may seem to trivialize it. But still, let me say what I think.

Yes, I do ask for sympathy for the boys and young men who did this, because of what they are about to go through. I may be reading too much into what you wrote, but it seems to me that you toss off very casually the fact that they will "serve jail time". This is not something mildly unpleasant, like a trip to the dentist or the DMV. We're talking about them losing their entire lives or at least the best decades of their lives. We're talking about being locked in a cage without hope, in conditions so violent and overcrowded that it will significantly reduce their life expectancy. And they have a very good chance of being raped themselves. In any given week in prison they may well suffer much more than that girl did in Richmond. The two experiences are so different in scale as to be hard to even compare to each other.

Let me suggest a thought experiment. Let's play "eye for an eye". Let's suppose we offered one of these kids a choice. He could go to prison, for decades or for life, as I described above, and if he ever did get out he'd still be a social pariah. Or, he could be raped. Let it be a violent, brutal gang rape, like his victim suffered in Richmond. Bad enough to send him to the hospital. (I'm sure we could find plenty of volunteers from the current prison population who'd be happy to do the deed for us.) But then when it's over, it's over. He could go free, his "debt" considered to be paid in full. What do you think he'd choose?

I know what I'd choose, if that decision were offered to me. I'd take the rape in a heartbeat. Because afterward, I'd get my life back. I'm a relatively old man, with less than half the years ahead of me that these kids have, but those years are still precious to me. And to clinch the decision, if I did choose prison I could still be raped anyway, so what would I have gained?

On the subject of rape being one of the vilest of crimes, I don't entirely buy it. As I see it the girl in Richmond has potentially suffered four harms, and I will list them from the most to the least important:

1. She may have gotten AIDS, or some other fatal disease. If so then the offense essentially rises to murder. I'm not a death penalty advocate, but I wouldn't argue too much with the death penalty for those who gave her such a disease.

2. She was beaten, and probably also suffered injuries from the rapes themselves. We don't know how severe those injuries were, or how lasting the effects will be. Note, though, that I'm equating the injuries from the rapes with those from the beatings. What matters to me is the severity, not how she got them.

3. She was raped. Here I'm talking about only the fact of rape itself, separate from the potentials for lasting injury that I listed above. Pregnancy is not much of an issue because rape victims are routinely given a morning after pill. In past years there was a social stigma attached to being raped. In some cultures that still persists today. But in our society that's largely a thing of the past.

When you take all these other things away, all we're left with is sex. Sex is a big psychological part of human lives, but I refuse to elevate it above all other things as a "violation to top all other violations". Any of the negative attributes it has: violation, humiliation, helplessness, social stigma, and so on, apply even more to prison than they do to rape.

4. The girl's fourth harm is that she was robbed. I place this last, because material possessions are ultimately unimportant compared to our bodies and our dignity.

But then I stop to think. I have a ring. Not very valuable or attractive, but it was my father's before me and was passed down from his grandfather, who I never met. If I were given a choice: lose that ring, or be raped, which would I choose? I'd have to think about it. It isn't an easy decision.
6

report abuse
vote down
vote up
November 01, 2009
Votes: -5
Cara: ...
Louis,

While I agree that perpetrators of crimes are often not seen in the context of their life circumstances or of the whole story of the crime, I do not see that Pastor Byron has in any way joined a “competition” to insult these young men. I see his article as a commentary on the crime itself and his dismay that we, as a society, don’t appear to have advanced much past Cro-Magnon times if a crime this heinous and callous can still occur in our “postmodern” times.

As a rape survivor I was especially impressed by his characterization of rape as a unique crime that doesn’t ever have mitigating circumstances (“justifiable rape”) in the sense that murder is sometimes legally justified in cases of self-defense.

I find it interesting that you see the 15 year old girl as being somehow covered because she’s receiving an outpouring of sympathy. Do you really think she will ever be the same again? I’m a survivor of a single perpetrator. I can’t even imagine what this girl went through. She will have to deal with the repercussions of this for the rest of her life. So will the perpetrators. Are you seriously asking for our sympathy for the fact that they will serve jail time for the choices they made?

I have forgiven my rapist. I’ve tried to understand why he did it. That doesn’t mean he should expect to get a free pass from the court of public opinion. I had a lot of hard work to do to become a survivor. I haven’t spent any time wondering if my rapist is OK. That’s his part of the equation.

Chris Rock recently gave his views while discussing the Roman Polanski rape. He ranked murder as the worst possible crime with rape being second worst. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...07816.html

I’m personally thrilled to see men come forward and call this crime what it is. Thank you Pastor Byron.


7

report abuse
vote down
vote up
October 31, 2009
Votes: +3
Louis: ...
Pastor Byron,

I read your column in Thursday's newspaper and found it very disturbing---but not surprising. There is a bandwagon effect that forms with any high-profile case like this. Politicians, law enforcement, the media, and others in the community compete with each other to see who can hate the perpetrators the most.
Your column was part of this movement, and you dug deep into your insult bin to join the competition. You call them Cro Magnons, and lower than animals. You say more than once that they took away the girl's humanity, but you refuse to see these young men as human beings. The girl is receiving a tremendous outpouring of community sympathy; you preemptively insult anyone who would attempt to understand this event from the boys' point of view.
The headline for your column calls the crime "incomprehensible". It is not. It is easy to understand why these kids did what they did. That doesn't make it right---and please understand me, I am not condoning their crime. But it is only incomprehensible if we willfully refuse to understand it.
This accumulation of community hatred has a goal and an effect. By casting the boys as less than human, we prepare ourselves for the idea that they are of no value, and any punishment they receive---anything at all---is perfectly justified. Their lives are over. Ambitious prosecutors are calling for life in prison for kids not yet old enough to shave. If any of them ever do see the outside world again, it will not be as free men. As sex offenders they will be subject to unending persecution designed to cut them off from their communities, confine them to ghettos, and if any excuse presents itself, return them to prison permanently.
You say that rape is one of the vilest acts in our society, but there are things worse than rape. Prison is worse than rape. This is true for many reasons, but it is trivially true because it so often includes rape.
Certainly the girl deserves our sympathy, our compassion, but so many are clamoring to show her sympathy that I can add nothing to what has already been said. I'd rather reserve my sympathy for the truly powerless, those no one else seems to care about.
8

report abuse
vote down
vote up
October 31, 2009
Votes: -3
Victoria: ...
Pastor Byron--

I absolutely agree with your essay and the follow-up note you wrote to Catherine. What hurts my heart (frankly, I can think of no other way to say it) is thinking about what we are doing (as a community, society, nation, etc.) to raise boys/young men who would be part of such a horrible act, either by participating or by watching. I live in Richmond (4 blocks from Richmond High) and I have taught years of teenage boys (and now work in various schools teaching teachers, so I'm around teenage boys every day). While I would like to say that none of the students I've ever worked with would have been part of such a horrific crime, I'm sure that the teachers/parents/relatives of the boys involved all thought the same thing. This speaks to a much deeper fissure in our collective humanity and I'm absolutely with you: What do we do with this? Beyond the demands for justice for the girl, what can we all do differently to ensure that all our children recognize the value of the human beings around them? This atrocious event tells me we have failed everyone involved. We clearly failed the young woman, but we have also failed the young men if they learned somehow that they had no responsibility to help a fellow human being in need.
9

report abuse
vote down
vote up
October 29, 2009
Votes: +1
revbyron: ...
Hi Catherine:

Thank you for your message. I had several individuals e-mail me about peer pressure, mob mentality, etc. as a reason for what happened. One even said, as I stated in my piece, that the victim's drinking was a culprit as if that justifies taking someone's humanity. What troubled me about the e-mails is that they did not start from the premise this is wrong. It more of the "yes this is wrong, but..." And and I am certain you understand there can be no "but", when it comes to rape.

Best,

Byron
10

report abuse
vote down
vote up
October 29, 2009
Votes: +0
Catherine : ...
Hello Pastor,

I heard you this morning on KGO and as a result came to your website and read on Huffington Post your "What Do We Do With This" piece on the Richmond High rape. I appreciate very much your analogy of the bystanders at the rape bringing back memories of white klansmen at lynchings. It was a brilliant analogy and one I think MANY people need to consider.

Could you tell me though what you were referring to this morning when you said that you had been getting emails claiming that there WERE mitigating circumstances? Could you tell me what you meant by that?

Thank You,

Catherine
11

report abuse
vote down
vote up
October 29, 2009
Votes: -1

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
< Prev   Next >
We have 4 guests online

ImagePost a Comment.

We want to hear what you think!

Upcoming Events

No events
< March 2010 > »
M T W T F S S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31 1 2 3 4

The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in times of great moral crises maintain their neutrality

-- Dante

Locations of visitors to this page

 


Warning: fopen(/home/byronspe/public_html/_home/components/com_sef/cache/shCacheContent.php) [
function.fopen]: failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/byronspe/public_html/_home/components/com_sef/shCache.php on line 106